 |
Delfini
Project
Showcase: Venous
Thromboembolism (VTE) Prevention Project
|
| 
This project
is a landmark project in many ways.
Read Delfini commentary
on the Kaiser Permanente Hawaii VTE Prevention Project. |
Kaiser
Permanente Hawaii (KPHI): Prevention of Venous Thromboemobolism (VTE)
in Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement
Mission: Help
advance evidence- and value-based medicine in an organization that has
already proved a demonstrated commitment to evidence- and value-based
care by dedicating resources to EBM training and support and that now
seeks to progress to an even higher level in skill, depth, application
and cultural transformation.
|
Success
Stories:
Clinical Guideline &
Quality Improvement Project
Page
Navigation
.......
Home
What's New
Intro
Links
Services
Resources
Success
Stories
Notices
About
Us
About Our Work
Testimonials
Other
Site Navigator
Contact
Us
Site
Search
.......
delfini.org

Also creators
of
medicalleaders.org
Page
Navigation
|
Concept:
Identify
a clinical group that has ideas for a successful evidence-based clinical
improvement project and provide them with training and support. Learnings
will be applicable to other projects, plus team members will be able to
facilitate similar projects with other clinical groups within the care
system.
Delfini
Role: Provide training, facilitation and support to the
team to conduct the project and to effect both clinical and evidence-based
process change. |
Venous
Thromboembolism (VTE) Prevention Update, Clinical Practice Guideline &
Decision Support |
| Update:
What’s
New In Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis For Total Hip and Total
Knee Replacement Surgery 2009
In the summer of 2008,
a group of KPHI clinicians and other stakeholders (orthopedists, hospitalists,
pharmacists, nurses, facilitators, CME and EBM specialists) formed a working
group—the KPHI VTE Prevention Guideline Team—along with Delfini
to address the significant uncertainty about the following key questions:
- What is the evidence
that thromboembolism or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis with
various agents reduces mortality and clinically significant morbidity
in hip and knee replacement surgery?
- What is the evidence
regarding timing of anticoagulant prophylaxis for appropriate agents
when used for prevention of thromboembolism in hip and knee replacement
surgery?
• What is the evidence regarding starting anticoagulant prophylaxis?
• What is the evidence regarding duration of anticoagulant prophylaxis?
- What is the evidence
regarding bleeding from thromboembolism prophylaxis with the various
appropriate agents?
What We Learned
and Recommend To Others
- The risk of VTE
in total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) surgery
without VTE prophylaxis is frighteningly high with reported figures
from 41% to 85%.
- The level of evidence
(LOE) is fair for reduction of overall DVT rates with mechanical compression
devices used in conjunction with recommended pharmacological agents;
LOE is inconclusive for reduction of symptomatic DVT, proximal DVT and
PE rates.
- Current national
guidelines are conflicting and include evidence with significant threats
to validity.
- With mechanical
compression and pharmacological prophylaxis some studies report incidence
rates of 10% to 15%.
- Based on our evidence
review and evidence synthesis the KPHI VTE Prevention Guideline Team
recommends that —
- Mechanical
compression devices be used in conjunction with recommended pharmacological
agents (enoxaparin, warfarin, fondaparinux or aspirin).
- Both compression
devices and recommended pharmacological agents be continued at least
through discharge, to achieve the lowest possible DVT rates in THR
and TKR surgery.
- Until further
evidence is available, decisions regarding the extension of VTE
prophylaxis beyond hospitalization be individualized following risk
assessment.
- Aspirin alone
not be used as VTE prophylaxis in THR and TKR surgery because there
is fair evidence that aspirin alone is not effective in preventing
VTE and in one study the DVT rate was 47%.
Details
regarding specific mechanical devices, drugs, bleeding risks, the quality
of the evidence, dosing, etc. are available immediately below.
Read the interview
with medical leader, Karen Ching MD, about how
to make such evidence-based quality improvement projects successful.
|
| Venous
Thromboembolism Guideline Materials |
Venous
Thromboembolism Guideline Materials
are posted with permission
from Kaiser Permanente Hawaii and Delfini Group. Selected components of
guideline documentation are available from Sheri upon request at sstrite (at) delfini.org.
Also from the Agency
for Healthcare Research & Quality, general
information for patients about blood thinners. |
| Project
Outline |
| Phase
1: Identify Team |
.........
Leaders from Medical Education and the EBM Working Group solicited
interest among clinical staff. With Delfini's guidance, a multidisciplinary
team was formed including orthopedic surgeons, a vascular surgeon,
hospitalists, pharmacy, nursing and an EBM working group leader. |
| Phase
2: Select Project |
.........
Delfini provided advice and training in successful project selection.
Total knee and total hip replacement surgery was identified as a topical
focus area. The team agreed upon development and implementation of
a clinical practice guideline as their EBM clinical improvement project. |
| Phase
3: Develop Project Outline
|
.........
Existing guidelines were reviewed for applicability, validity, appropriateness
and currency. A focus statement was created.
Focus statement:
7/25/08
"A standardized, evidence based DVT prophylaxis protocol for
the known high risk total knee and hip replacement population."
Key issues
Focus on prophylaxis for joint replacement surgery
- Bleeding risk from
pharmacologic prophylaxis
- Duration of therapy
for anticoagulant prophylaxis
- When to start.
Role of preoperative prophylaxis
Key Questions
Clinical Questions Addressed in this QI Project
1. What is the evidence that thromboembolism or DVT prophylaxis
with various agents reduces mortality and clinically significant
morbidity in hip and knee replacement surgery?
2. What is the evidence regarding timing of anticoagulant prophylaxis
for appropriate agents when used for prevention of thromboembolism
in hip and knee replacement surgery?
— What is the evidence regarding starting anticoagulant prophylaxis?
— What is the evidence regarding duration of anticoagulant
prophylaxis?
3. What is the evidence regarding bleeding from thromboembolism
prophylaxis with the various appropriate agents? |
Phase
4: Obtain, Evaluate & Synthesize Evidence & Phase 5: Create
Clinical Recommendations
|
.........
Existing guidelines and relevant systematic reviews were audited
to see if they passed a critical appraisal screen. (They did not.)
Potentially useful
evidence was obtained through a systematic search and filtering
process using titles and abstracts. Following filtering, the potentially
best available valid and useful evidence was identified and readied
for critical appraisal
Team
members received training in effective searching of the medical
literature, critical appraisal for validity and clinical usefulness
of primary and secondary sources, measures of outcomes, effective
use of confidence intervals, evidence grading and more.
Members
of the KPHI VTE Quality Improvement Project & Guideline Team:
Pictured are
Lynn Wardwell PharmD & Mike Stuart MD, Delfini Facilitator.
(Hiding behind Lynn is Rob Shin, MD, Orthopedic Surgeon.) Also hiding
besides other team members is Sheri, Delfini facilitator,typing
frantically, trying to keep up with the brilliant team as they craft
draft clinical DVT recommendations.
In 2 two-day on-site
working sessions, team members accomplished the following —
- Critical Appraisals
- Evidence Syntheses
- Clinical Recommendations
Process
Multi-disciplinary teams of 2-3 conducted 34 critical appraisals
for validity and clinical usefulness on-site during these 2 two-day
training and working sessions. Team members could engage others
or request participation of the entire 11 member team participants.
Following appraisal, the team recorded key details of passing studies,
created evidence statements for each study, synthesized the evidence
from these statements and then crafted clinical recommendations
to form the basis of the guideline.
Keys to Success
- Delfini-conducted
searches
- Effective (and appropriate)
use of secondary studies and sources
- Team participating
in filtering
- Effective training
- Prepared templates
and tools
- Multi-disciplinary
teams — each team had representation of expertise in VTE/DVT
management, pharmacy and EBM practice at a minimum
- Computer entry using
a streamlined critical appraisal and study detail capture system
- Initial modeling
with full group participation for several appraisals
- Online access to
confidence interval calculators, printers, etc
- Pre-assignment of
selected studies
- Rules encouraging
free engagement
- Group reporting
of passing studies and discussion
- Consensus building
methods to address controversies
- Examples to inspire
group reaction
- Process "tricks"
to facilitate group engagement in a complex process — example
1: color coding to separate draft from completed work, example
2: visual and oral transitions during synthesis...more! (Might
not sound very meaningful right now, but process tricks helped
a heap!)
- Just-in-time documentation
capture
|
| Phase
6: Assess Impacts of Practice Change |
.........
Not done for this project |
| Phase
7: Create information, Decision & Action Aids |
.........
|
| Phase
8: Implement Guideline |
.........
Ongoing |
| Phase
9: Implement Measurement & Reporting Plan |
.........
Pending |
| Phase
10: Continuous Improvement |
.........
Ongoing |
|
| Message
from
Delfini
|
| Kaiser
Permanente Hawaii: Prevention of Venous Thromboemobolism in Total Hip
and Total Knee Replacement
At the beginning of the 2005,
we were invited to work with Kaiser Permanente Hawaii to help advance
EBM within their organization. KP Hawaii has a strong commitment to evidence-
and value-based care. Their leaders are committed to supporting EBM. They
frequently sponsor outstanding EBM conferences and retreats which are
very well attended, and they have an impressive and active EBM working
group. They were desirous of taking EBM to a new level and expanding and
embedding evidence-based clinical improvement skills and techniques more
solidly and more broadly into their culture. We came up with an idea for
a working project that would provide just-in-time practical training,
advance clinical care and help further "seed" cultural change.
Our first project in 2005 was a Chronic Kidney Disease referral and management
guideline. (Read about the CKD project here.)
We facilitated a second project on management of elevated blood pressure.
This VTE project is our third.
In the meantime, the two
clinical leads of the CKD project were promoted into evidence-based leadership
positions in their organization which we consider to be further evidence
of the value of this approach. You can grow quality care through a clinical
project and you can grow quality overall in your organization as well.
This VTE project was phenomenal.
Some of the members were initially a little (or, admittedly, more than
a little) skeptical. All members were challenged for time beyond what
we usually experience. The combination of these two barrier forces meant
that necessity required our extreme inventiveness so that the project
would not fail.
We constructed a process
that we now think is an incredible model for doing evidence-based quality
improvements, utilizing just-in-time group activities. We had a series
of initial short phone meetings with the group, did a lot of work behind-the-scenes,
had a 2 day training and work-intensive in mid-November of 2008 and then
followed that with another 2-day work-intensive in mid-January resulting
in the completion of major work in record time and in a highly rigorous
way.
At the completion of the
work session on evidence synthesis and clinical recommendations on day
4, one of our most resistant and skeptical colleagues raved! "I was
a little lost at first," he said, "but now I really get it,
and this was great!" The team is energized and enthused. Major skills
have been acquired. Change has occurred. People are having objective communications
based on evidence (and lack thereof) where they have only minimally communicated
before since there was so much uncertainty and lack of a centered focus
due to the clinical controversies in this area and lack of clarity. Patients
and clinicians will now get some needed help even if just to know how
much of what might be done is not supported by science.
We are so happy and honored
to do this work with some of the greatest minds we have ever encountered.
We are thrilled we have helped them and their patients. We are ever learners
— we are happy to have developed more solutions and honed more methods
to help groups achieve success in clinical quality. If you have not already
done so, we urge you to read the VTE Update and
interview with Dr. Karen Ching on how to achieve project success.
Mahalo,
&
|
Delfini
SERVICES
We offer a wide range
of supportive services
with the ultimate goal of increasing health care organizations’
and clinicians’ abilities to provide high quality, evidence-based
care and to improve medical decision-making
for organizations, leaders, teams, clinicians and patients.
Delfini
About Our Work 
Resources at
—
|
|
Return
to Top
©
Delfini Group, LLC, 2002-2010. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
Use
of this website implies your agreement to our Notices.
EBM Solutions
for Evidence Based Health Care Quality
|