Delfini Evidence-based Medicine Logo

Delfini Project Showcase: Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prevention Project

DVT EBM Training

This project is a landmark project in many ways.
Read Delfini
commentary on the Kaiser Permanente Hawaii VTE Prevention Project.

Kaiser Permanente Hawaii (KPHI): Prevention of Venous Thromboemobolism (VTE) in Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement

Mission: Help advance evidence- and value-based medicine in an organization that has already proved a demonstrated commitment to evidence- and value-based care by dedicating resources to EBM training and support and that now seeks to progress to an even higher level in skill, depth, application and cultural transformation.

 


Success Stories:
Clinical Guideline & Quality Improvement Project
Page Navigation
.......
Home
What's New
Intro Links

Services
Resources
Success Stories
Notices
About Us
About Our Work
Testimonials
Other
Site Navigator
Contact Us

Site Search
.......

delfini.org
Delfini Group EBM Dolphin

Also creators of
medicalleaders.org

Page Navigation

 

Concept: Identify a clinical group that has ideas for a successful evidence-based clinical improvement project and provide them with training and support. Learnings will be applicable to other projects, plus team members will be able to facilitate similar projects with other clinical groups within the care system.

Delfini Role: Provide training, facilitation and support to the team to conduct the project and to effect both clinical and evidence-based process change.

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prevention Update, Clinical Practice Guideline & Decision Support

Update: What’s New In Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis For Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement Surgery 2009

In the summer of 2008, a group of KPHI clinicians and other stakeholders (orthopedists, hospitalists, pharmacists, nurses, facilitators, CME and EBM specialists) formed a working group—the KPHI VTE Prevention Guideline Team—along with Delfini to address the significant uncertainty about the following key questions:

  1. What is the evidence that thromboembolism or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis with various agents reduces mortality and clinically significant morbidity in hip and knee replacement surgery?
  2. What is the evidence regarding timing of anticoagulant prophylaxis for appropriate agents when used for prevention of thromboembolism in hip and knee replacement surgery?
    • What is the evidence regarding starting anticoagulant prophylaxis?
    • What is the evidence regarding duration of anticoagulant prophylaxis?
  3. What is the evidence regarding bleeding from thromboembolism prophylaxis with the various appropriate agents?

What We Learned and Recommend To Others

  • The risk of VTE in total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) surgery without VTE prophylaxis is frighteningly high with reported figures from 41% to 85%.
  • The level of evidence (LOE) is fair for reduction of overall DVT rates with mechanical compression devices used in conjunction with recommended pharmacological agents; LOE is inconclusive for reduction of symptomatic DVT, proximal DVT and PE rates.
  • Current national guidelines are conflicting and include evidence with significant threats to validity.
  • With mechanical compression and pharmacological prophylaxis some studies report incidence rates of 10% to 15%.
  • Based on our evidence review and evidence synthesis the KPHI VTE Prevention Guideline Team recommends that —
    1. Mechanical compression devices be used in conjunction with recommended pharmacological agents (enoxaparin, warfarin, fondaparinux or aspirin).
    2. Both compression devices and recommended pharmacological agents be continued at least through discharge, to achieve the lowest possible DVT rates in THR and TKR surgery.
    3. Until further evidence is available, decisions regarding the extension of VTE prophylaxis beyond hospitalization be individualized following risk assessment.
    4. Aspirin alone not be used as VTE prophylaxis in THR and TKR surgery because there is fair evidence that aspirin alone is not effective in preventing VTE and in one study the DVT rate was 47%.

Details regarding specific mechanical devices, drugs, bleeding risks, the quality of the evidence, dosing, etc. are available immediately below.

Read the interview with medical leader, Karen Ching MD, about how to make such evidence-based quality improvement projects successful.

 

Venous Thromboembolism Guideline Materials

Venous Thromboembolism Guideline Materials are posted with permission from Kaiser Permanente Hawaii and Delfini Group. Selected components of guideline documentation are available from Sheri upon request at sstrite (at) delfini.org.

Also from the Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality, general information for patients about blood thinners.

Project Outline
Phase 1: Identify Team

.........
Leaders from Medical Education and the EBM Working Group solicited interest among clinical staff. With Delfini's guidance, a multidisciplinary team was formed including orthopedic surgeons, a vascular surgeon, hospitalists, pharmacy, nursing and an EBM working group leader.

Phase 2: Select Project
.........
Delfini provided advice and training in successful project selection. Total knee and total hip replacement surgery was identified as a topical focus area. The team agreed upon development and implementation of a clinical practice guideline as their EBM clinical improvement project.

Phase 3: Develop Project Outline

 

 

.........
Existing guidelines were reviewed for applicability, validity, appropriateness and currency. A focus statement was created.

Focus statement: 7/25/08
"A standardized, evidence based DVT prophylaxis protocol for the known high risk total knee and hip replacement population."

Key issues
Focus on prophylaxis for joint replacement surgery

  • Bleeding risk from pharmacologic prophylaxis
  • Duration of therapy for anticoagulant prophylaxis
  • When to start. Role of preoperative prophylaxis

Key Questions
Clinical Questions Addressed in this QI Project
1. What is the evidence that thromboembolism or DVT prophylaxis with various agents reduces mortality and clinically significant morbidity in hip and knee replacement surgery?
2. What is the evidence regarding timing of anticoagulant prophylaxis for appropriate agents when used for prevention of thromboembolism in hip and knee replacement surgery?
— What is the evidence regarding starting anticoagulant prophylaxis?
— What is the evidence regarding duration of anticoagulant prophylaxis?
3. What is the evidence regarding bleeding from thromboembolism prophylaxis with the various appropriate agents?

Phase 4: Obtain, Evaluate & Synthesize Evidence & Phase 5: Create Clinical Recommendations

 

 

 

.........
Existing guidelines and relevant systematic reviews were audited to see if they passed a critical appraisal screen. (They did not.)

Potentially useful evidence was obtained through a systematic search and filtering process using titles and abstracts. Following filtering, the potentially best available valid and useful evidence was identified and readied for critical appraisal

DVT EBM Training and Health Care Quality Improvement TeamTeam members received training in effective searching of the medical literature, critical appraisal for validity and clinical usefulness of primary and secondary sources, measures of outcomes, effective use of confidence intervals, evidence grading and more.

Members of the KPHI VTE Quality Improvement Project & Guideline Team:
Pictured are Lynn Wardwell PharmD & Mike Stuart MD, Delfini Facilitator. (Hiding behind Lynn is Rob Shin, MD, Orthopedic Surgeon.) Also hiding besides other team members is Sheri, Delfini facilitator,typing frantically, trying to keep up with the brilliant team as they craft draft clinical DVT recommendations.

In 2 two-day on-site working sessions, team members accomplished the following —

  • Critical Appraisals
  • Evidence Syntheses
  • Clinical Recommendations

Process
Multi-disciplinary teams of 2-3 conducted 34 critical appraisals for validity and clinical usefulness on-site during these 2 two-day training and working sessions. Team members could engage others or request participation of the entire 11 member team participants. Following appraisal, the team recorded key details of passing studies, created evidence statements for each study, synthesized the evidence from these statements and then crafted clinical recommendations to form the basis of the guideline.

Keys to Success

  • Delfini-conducted searches
  • Effective (and appropriate) use of secondary studies and sources
  • Team participating in filtering
  • Effective training
  • Prepared templates and tools
  • Multi-disciplinary teams — each team had representation of expertise in VTE/DVT management, pharmacy and EBM practice at a minimum
  • Computer entry using a streamlined critical appraisal and study detail capture system
    • Initial modeling with full group participation for several appraisals
  • Online access to confidence interval calculators, printers, etc
  • Pre-assignment of selected studies
  • Rules encouraging free engagement
  • Group reporting of passing studies and discussion
  • Consensus building methods to address controversies
  • Examples to inspire group reaction
  • Process "tricks" to facilitate group engagement in a complex process — example 1: color coding to separate draft from completed work, example 2: visual and oral transitions during synthesis...more! (Might not sound very meaningful right now, but process tricks helped a heap!)
  • Just-in-time documentation capture
Phase 6: Assess Impacts of Practice Change

.........
Not done for this project

Phase 7: Create information, Decision & Action Aids
.........
Phase 8: Implement Guideline

.........
Ongoing

Phase 9: Implement Measurement & Reporting Plan

.........
Pending

Phase 10: Continuous Improvement

.........
Ongoing
Message from Delfini

Kaiser Permanente Hawaii: Prevention of Venous Thromboemobolism in Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement

At the beginning of the 2005, we were invited to work with Kaiser Permanente Hawaii to help advance EBM within their organization. KP Hawaii has a strong commitment to evidence- and value-based care. Their leaders are committed to supporting EBM. They frequently sponsor outstanding EBM conferences and retreats which are very well attended, and they have an impressive and active EBM working group. They were desirous of taking EBM to a new level and expanding and embedding evidence-based clinical improvement skills and techniques more solidly and more broadly into their culture. We came up with an idea for a working project that would provide just-in-time practical training, advance clinical care and help further "seed" cultural change. Our first project in 2005 was a Chronic Kidney Disease referral and management guideline. (Read about the CKD project here.) We facilitated a second project on management of elevated blood pressure. This VTE project is our third.

In the meantime, the two clinical leads of the CKD project were promoted into evidence-based leadership positions in their organization which we consider to be further evidence of the value of this approach. You can grow quality care through a clinical project and you can grow quality overall in your organization as well.

This VTE project was phenomenal. Some of the members were initially a little (or, admittedly, more than a little) skeptical. All members were challenged for time beyond what we usually experience. The combination of these two barrier forces meant that necessity required our extreme inventiveness so that the project would not fail.

We constructed a process that we now think is an incredible model for doing evidence-based quality improvements, utilizing just-in-time group activities. We had a series of initial short phone meetings with the group, did a lot of work behind-the-scenes, had a 2 day training and work-intensive in mid-November of 2008 and then followed that with another 2-day work-intensive in mid-January resulting in the completion of major work in record time and in a highly rigorous way.

At the completion of the work session on evidence synthesis and clinical recommendations on day 4, one of our most resistant and skeptical colleagues raved! "I was a little lost at first," he said, "but now I really get it, and this was great!" The team is energized and enthused. Major skills have been acquired. Change has occurred. People are having objective communications based on evidence (and lack thereof) where they have only minimally communicated before since there was so much uncertainty and lack of a centered focus due to the clinical controversies in this area and lack of clarity. Patients and clinicians will now get some needed help even if just to know how much of what might be done is not supported by science.

We are so happy and honored to do this work with some of the greatest minds we have ever encountered. We are thrilled we have helped them and their patients. We are ever learners — we are happy to have developed more solutions and honed more methods to help groups achieve success in clinical quality. If you have not already done so, we urge you to read the VTE Update and interview with Dr. Karen Ching on how to achieve project success.

Mahalo,
&

Delfini SERVICES
We offer a wide range of supportive services with the ultimate goal of increasing health care organizations’ and clinicians’ abilities to provide high quality, evidence-based care and to improve medical decision-making for organizations, leaders, teams, clinicians and patients.

Delfini About Our Work Delfini Group EBM DolphinDelfini Group EBM Dolphin

Resources at —

 

Return to Top

© Delfini Group, LLC, 2002-2010. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
Use of this website implies your agreement to our Notices.

EBM Solutions for Evidence Based Health Care Quality